Issue
#30 – The Power of the Moneyline
Just
about every sports bettor on the planet understands, and bets on,
pointspreads, but only a fraction understand, and bet, moneylines. It is an
even smaller percentage of bettors that can recognize when a moneyline is
presenting value and play accordingly. In this week’s column I want to
discuss how to compare the spread to the moneyline so you may be able to
find some value yourself.
As a
starting point for those that have yet to try and figure out moneylines,
here is a quick primer. More experienced bettors can skip to the next
paragraph. Reading a moneyline is very simple. A typical moneyline would be
something like Denver Broncos –165, Miami Dolphins +145. The –165 means you
must risk $165 to win $100 on the Broncos while the +145 means you get back
$145 for each $100 risked should the Dolphins win outright. Any –number
means that is the risk to win $100 and any +number is the payoff for risking
$100. It is that simple. In the event of a tie, all moneyline wagers are
settled as a Push and monies are refunded. The difference between the two
lines typically starts at 20 “cents” in football and gets larger as the
numbers get higher. For example, if the favorite is –240, the dog may be
+200, a difference of 40 “cents”. The higher difference at higher numbers
simply serves to keep the percentage of vig for the house roughly the same
(perhaps I will cover this math in a later column, but you will have to
trust me on this for now).
Next
up, I want to look at how to compare a spread to a moneyline. Although each
offshore book is different, here is a chart that is published on the
Internet showing a general guideline for converting spreads to moneylines in
the NFL. Note that college is slightly different and is omitted here in the
interest of space.
|
Favorite Pointspread |
Corresponding Moneyline |
| -2 |
-130/+110 |
| -2.5 |
-140/+120 |
| -3
|
-155/+135 |
| -3.5 |
-175/+155 |
| -4 |
-200/+170 |
| -4.5 |
-220/+180 |
|
-5/-5.5 |
-240/+190 |
| -6 |
-270/+210 |
| -6.5 |
-300/+220 |
| -7 |
-330/+250 |
|
-7.5/-8/-8.5 |
-360/+280 |
|
-9/-9.5 |
-400/+300 |
| -10 |
-450/+325 |
| -11
|
-550/+375 |
| -12 |
-600/+400 |
| -13 |
-650/+450 |
One of
the most common questions I am asked in reader emails is why we don’t offer
moneylines for spreads outside the 2-14 range. The reason is that outside
these ranges it becomes difficult to balance action. If a spread moves from
–1.5 to –1, you don’t have much room to move on the moneyline. Players will
simply ignore betting the +1 and take the dog at +105 or even, lowering the
vig for the house. Above 14, the moneylines are just too high. Bettors
seldom lay the big price and then the House sometimes takes big hits when
the big upsets come in (like last year’s Super Bowl).
All
right, now we can talk about value. This past weekend, players bet heavier
on 10 favorites, 3 dogs and were evenly split on one other game. On the
other hand, the moneyline action was heavier for ZERO favorites, 7 dogs, and
balanced on 6 (we had no moneyline for New Orleans/Washington). Spreads were
offside 10-3 on favorites - Moneylines were offside 7-0 on dogs. Guess where
you will find value. Considering that favorites were 5-9 against-the-spread
(ATS), but 9-5 Straight Up (SU), there was definitely moneyline value this
past weekend on the favorites.
An
interesting situation that arises as a result of these player trends is that
books often profit on both lines when a favorite wins but doesn’t cover.
Kansas City/San Diego is a great example. The spread moved all the way from
Chargers –3 last Monday to Chargers –4 at kickoff. The Betting public was
heavy on San Diego. However, our moneyline only moved from –175 when posted
on Thursday (spread was SD –3.5 at the time) to –190 at kickoff. According
to the chart above, that moneyline should have been –200 but bettors didn’t
seem to care and were taking the Chiefs +165 in droves. When Drew Brees led
the winning drive to edge the Chiefs 35-34, we were left in a win-win
situation as we collected on both the Chargers money on the spread and the
Chiefs money on the moneyline. Note that the Bills-Texans, Cowboys-Panthers
and Colts-Ravens games also had the favorite winning but not covering and
resulted in a pretty good weekend for books.
These
betting trends are not limited to football. Over the past 4 days, bettors
had the favorite on the runline (baseball’s version of the spread, always
–1.5 runs) in all 6 League Championship games played. They had the dog on
the moneyline in 5 of those. With the favorite winning by 1-run in three of
the game (Anaheim 2-1 Friday, San Francisco 4-3 Sunday and 2-1 Monday), we
were able to collect both ways on those three games and have a great
baseball weekend.
Not
every moneyline will present an opportunity, but be sure to compare the
moneylines and corresponding spread. Wagering is a game of supply and
demand. Going against the public trends will lead to you getting better
“prices” on all your plays and you will be more profitable in the long run.
As
always I am pleased to present BoDog’s top bookmaker, Kent, and his Line
Move of the Week. This past weekend, I was able to get down the wager
center/head office in Costa Rica and take in the action myself. (If you get
a chance to go to San Jose, be sure to go to the restaurant Tex Mex in Santa
Ana. Their Muchaca Burrito is by far my favorite meal in Costa Rica, and
perhaps the world, so I make it a point to stop in on every trip and I made
Kent take me there after the last games kicked off on Saturday. I am still
full...). Anyway, here is what Kent had to say:
“I
know Rob is writing about Moneylines this week so I was going to use the
Chargers-Chiefs game. Now, he tells me he has already used that game in his
column. (You take the guy out for dinner and he steals your thunder. What a
guy!) Second choice would be the Broncos-Dolphins game on Sunday Night. We
opened Broncos –3.5 (Even) and I fully expected this to be a messy 3/3.5
spread as many of the primetime games have been this week. However, the
number worked out very well as players loaded up on Denver and the line
moved to –3.5 (-110). The Dolphin action was on the moneyline and it
actually moved slightly in the opposite direction from +155 down to +150. It
looked like a golden situation with us cheering for a small Broncos win.
When the Broncos scored to go up 22-21, we thought we had another big middle
but the Dolphins came back to win 24-22 and we ended up with just a modest
profit.”
My
thanks to Kent and remember to check the spread against the moneyline in
every sport you bet. Every once in a while, you will find a mismatch and be
able to take advantage of the value.
I always welcome comments, questions and suggestions via
email at rob@bodog.com